Baseball season has begun! That means 162 games over the
next six months. And that doesn’t even include the extra month for playoffs in
October (and into November).
When you think of baseball, what do you think of? Eating
a hotdog in left field while soaking in the summer sun? Or bundled up avoiding
snowflakes in 30 degree weather?
I think it’s quite obvious which scenario is more
synonymous with the great American pastime. Then why is it that the season
begins with snow still on the ground? Why is it that the most important games
of the year, those playoff and World Series games, are played in 30-40 degree
weather more often than not? The legitimacy of a World Series champion is
compromised in my mind due to weather.
Why not fix this? There are a couple of very simple
options that could make a baseball season that doesn’t last until the near
winter months.
Option 1: Lessen the Number of Games
Now, I’m going to dismiss this just as quickly as I bring
it up. But think about it for a minute. We have six months to play ball. That’s
26 weeks, 183 days. We need to somehow fit in there 162 games? If you don’t
count the three or four days off around the All-Star Break, that’s 21 days
without a game. That’s less than one per week (nearly one every other week once
you factor in the All-Star Break days). So the obvious way to end the season
sooner is to lessen the games. The season will end before snow is on the
ground, and maybe the players could actually be somewhat rested for once!
I’ve said for years that the baseball season is too long
and makes games insignificant. One game out of 162 is much less significant
than one out of 82 in hockey or basketball, or one out of 16 in football. But
the devil’s advocate has arisen in me. Even though each game is less significant,
there are also less “streaky” teams as a result. A team has to be consistently
good all year round to make the postseason in MLB, whereas recent Stanley Cup
winners and Super Bowl champions have been teams who snuck into the playoffs
and got hot at just the right time.
They won’t change it…its tradition. It’s been 162 games
for…well, forever. Records and history would be adjusted (think of the asterisk
beside Roger Maris’s 61 home runs). Show that you can be good all season
through a huge amount of games. That’s what it takes to be the best in
baseball, and that shouldn’t change.
Option 2: Start Later, End Sooner
Okay, James, you’ve already said that players are getting
worn out by having only 21 days without a game over a 26 week stretch, now you
want to shorten the span of the season?
Yes. Start the season on tax day: April 15. That extra
two weeks will all but ensure that inclement weather will be a non-factor in
99% of MLB ballparks. Also, end the season a week earlier, so that the first
week of playoffs still is in September. It should take 28 days AT MOST (if
every single series goes the maximum number of games) to work through the
playoffs (1 day plus 1 for travel for play-in, 5 games plus 2 travel day for
the DS, 7 games plus 3 travel days for the CS, and 7 games plus 2 travel days
for the WS).
So doing the math, that means we have 23 weeks in which
to play these games. That’s 162 games in 161 days. Anybody who passed third
grade math knows that this means there have to be multiple games on the same
day.
That’s precisely what I am proposing.
17 of the 23 Sundays are to be double-header Sundays.
Teams have more than enough pitching to throw two games on the same day. If teams average approximately one day off
for each 11 days played (about the same as it is in the current system), that
gives 13 days off (plus a three day All-Star Break) during the season. You
average about one extra day in a row throughout the season, and you play double
headers when you already have extremely deep pitching staffs.
Players are already given multiple days off during the
year. And I have no problem with that. With this new system, you can even
ENCOURAGE some start players to have a day of rest. It’s a business, and teams
should do what is best for their team and players. What is best is to not have the players
throwing in 30 degree weather. What is best is to encourage proper rest between
games for players. It makes sense for player safety to have the same number of
games in a shorter period of time.
MLB used to have double-headers regularly. Now they are
only scheduled for make-up game purposes. Why? Most likely due to economics: no
double-headers means you can charge for two games. In double-headers, a fan
sees two games for the price of one! Owners say that just cannot happen! And
that’s ridiculous. Mandate double-headers, allow ticket prices to be 20% higher
for the double-headers, and everybody wins. Players, fans, owners. Everybody
wins.
But it will never happen. Traditionalists won’t let it
happen, even though the original “tradition” was Sunday double-headers. Stick
to the status-quo…that’s what’s wrong with sports.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We love to hear your feedback! This site is created by the fans and for the fans. But please, keep it clean. Any lewd, obscene, or irrelevant comments will be removed immediately.